Advani and Modi - the real culprits escaping the law
By Asghar Ali Engineer,
More than 100 innocent persons were arrested after burning of S-6 in Godhra on 27th February 2002 which in turn followed demolition of Babri Masjid on 6th December 1992. The man mainly responsible for the former was Mr. L.K.Advani who, to fulfill his ambition for power raised the slogan ‘mandir wahin banayenge’ and played with the religious sentiments of common Hindus and our secular state looked the other way. The man responsible for the later was Narendra Modi, who exploited burning of S-6 in Godhra to retain his power which otherwise he was sure to loose. And both these worthies of BJP brought utter shame to our secular tradition and secular philosophy.
As a result of this conspiracy by these two men thousands died, lakhs uprooted from their hearths and homes and many more lost everything they had and yet both are not only unpunished but are enjoying power (Advani, though could not become Prime Minister which was his ambition but became Home Minister and deputy Prime Minister under Atal Bihari Vajpayeeji and is now a prominent opposition leader which also is a sort of power).
Narender Modi and L K Advani
Mr. Advani very promptly issues a statement that he has been vindicated the moment lower court pronounces some people guilty arrested by his or his Party’s Government even before higher court’s judgments often release them or declare them not guilty. The moment Mr. Jeelani was held guilty by the lower court in Parliament attack case, he did not hesitate to issue this statement even though he was Home Minister at the Centre. No one holding such responsible position should rush to issue such statement when the lower court has pronounced the judgment. The highest court i.e. the Supreme Court found Prof. Jeelani ‘not guilty’ and released him.
Again after the ‘Godhra Conspiracy Case’ judgment the Advani-speak was the same. He was delighted that 31 people were pronounced ‘guilty’ by the lower court although 63 were released and especially Husain Umerjee who was arrested as the ‘main conspirator’ was found not guilty by the Court. The whole conspiracy theory falls to the ground if the chief conspirator himself is found innocent. Who then plotted the conspiracy? But that was none of Advani’s concern. At least 31 have been found guilty. And it is out of question that he (Advaniji) will wait for higher courts to critically examine the judgment of the lower court.
Mr.Advani does this not because he is hasty by nature. He does it on purpose. He knows his guilt in raising emotionally surcharged issue of Ramjanambhoomi temple and getting it demolished in his august presence on 6th December, 1992 and wants to hide his guilt by pronouncing the victims themselves as guilty. Unfortunately this is the whole tragedy. Besides thousands who died due to the controversy Mr. Advani raised and lakhs who were uprooted and became refugees in their own country, hundreds suffered due to imprisonment for years.
In the Godhra case alone more than 100 persons were arrested under the charge of conspiracy some of whom died and 63, who spent 9 years in jail, were released by the court. Who will compensate them for precious loss of these years in prison? The Police in Modi Government arbitrarily picked up people and put them under POTA. I cannot forget the cries of a woman in public hearing in Hyderabad whose three sons were arrested in the so called Godhra conspiracy case and who has been released by the court. She was crying why POTA has taken away my sons, please tell POTA my sons are innocent. She swooned while crying. Obviously she did not know what the POTA was and thought it is name of some person. Her husband could not bear the tragedy and passed away after 4 years of his sons’ arrest. Every body in the audience was crying and I too could not hold up my tears when the woman was crying. Who can compensate her and her three sons for this loss?
What is more matter of concern is that while innocent people who have suffered so much already including those whose near and dear ones were burnt alive in Sabarmati Express those who are really guilty are enjoying power. Is this our secular democracy that those who incite religious sentiments enjoy power and those who sweat and toil for their daily existence loose their lives or suffer imprisonment for years? Can it fit into any human rights norms, let alone our secular political philosophy?
And what is worse Mr. L.K.Advani is not even being tried for demolition of Babri Masjid but for making provocative speech near Babri Masjid. That case was also withdrawn and now CBI has again applied for reviving the case. The CBI was as much pliant to the NDA Government as the BJP never tires of accusing the Congress of. It was under Home Ministership of Mr. Advani that such cases against him were withdrawn by the CBI.
In the first place Mr. Advani should not have been made Home Minister, much less becoming Deputy Prime Minister when he was being tried in the court of law by CBI which works under the home ministry. But anything can happen in democratic India. And still BJP has temerity of accusing the Congress of misusing CBI. This writer has nothing to do with the Congress and the Congress cannot be said to be above board at all. I am only pointing out double standards of the BJP.
Mr. Narendra Modi, less said the better. It is important to ask in his case what is good governance? To kill 2000 innocent people and rape scores of women, including pregnant women and to win power by inciting religious sentiment and to polarize people on religious grounds? For TATAs and Ambanis and other big industrialists it may amount to good governance but for common people it amounts to hell.
The Gujarat carnage, whatever Mr. Modi now does, cannot be forgotten and will go down in history as occurrence of greatest shame for secular India. Mr. Advani, who fights election from Gujarat, keeps on praising Modi on every possible occasion but it only adds to the gravity and criminality of the matter.
Even SIT (Special Investigation Team) appointed by the Supreme Court, though could not give clean chit to Mr. Modi but wriggled out by saying there is not enough evidence to try him. The SIT report published in Tehelka is damaging enough. If the SIT had proceeded further on that basis it could have surely found evidence to try Mr.Modi. Without Modi’s complicity riots could not have lasted even for 24 hours, let alone three months.
The cases of Bihar under Lalu Prasad and West Bengal under the Left Government clearly show, if any proof is needed, that no communal riot can last more than 24 hours without the state complicity. Can then Narendra Modi be exonerated of his complicity in riots? In no way. And SIT report and other investigative reports clearly indict him beyond any doubt. If his dark spot on the fair name of secularism is to be washed away the really guilty must be held accountable in any case.
Technicalities should not become an excuse to exonerate these people who have ruined the lives of thousands of people for ever. If these people can enjoy power by accusing innocent people of ‘conspiracy without any solid ground, can really guilty be not tried on very sound ground. Let us hope the Supreme Court will issue further directives to SIT or any other agencies to collect proper evidence against the guilty men of Gujarat. Most of the police high officers who did what the Government of Gujarat wanted them to do should also not be allowed to escape and must be held responsible.
These high officials cannot get away by saying they carried out orders of the Government. Their first duty is towards the Constitution of India and no unconstitutional orders can be followed. My experience in last forty five years of my work for communal harmony shows that communal violence cannot stop in this country unless the guilty people are given exemplary punishment. It is no use small fish being shown the stick and big fish enjoys all the benefits of inciting communal violence.
Let us all hope that one day it will happen and certainly so if the civil society shows proper awareness. It is fragmented civil society which allows such benefits of provoking communal sentiments by few politicians. Gujarat then certainly cannot repeat.
Showing posts with label Communalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Communalism. Show all posts
Saturday, March 05, 2011
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Grabbing Hindutva By Its Horns - By Rakesh Kumar
‘You really must meet Yugal-ji’, insisted my friend. We were at an activist meeting in Delhi . My friend indicated a middle-aged man, slimly-built with a broad, half-moon forehead, an unkempt beard and closely cropped graying hair, handing out leaflets to people filing into the lawn. He wore a thin cotton shirt and a simple, white handspun dhoti. ‘He’s a priest from Ayodhya and is in the thick of the battle against Hindutva.’
A man—a temple priest no less—taking on the Hindutva brigade at its very epicentre! I scrambled across the lawn to meet him. I simply had to hear his story. I introduced myself, and we got talking. I listened, humbled and stunned, as Yugal-ji began to tell me about himself, his life, his vision of and for the world, and, most especially, about his valiant struggle against communalism and institutionalized religion. By the time he had finished—two hours later—I had all but completely fallen in love with him.
Yugal-ji was born in 1954, in a village along the Indo-Nepalese border in Bihar ’s Sitamarhi district. His father, a poor peasant from the Yadav caste, insisted that his son must receive a decent education. He was sent to school, and then to college for Sanskrit studies, for which he shifted to Ayodhya, where he lived in an ashram and earned the coveted Shastri degree. There, sometime in the mid-seventies, he joined the RSS. ‘I was a young, energetic lad then, and loved playing games’ he reminisced. The local RSS shakha had devised a clever way of trapping young Hindu boys by organizing sports events. ‘That’s how I fell into their snare.’ He rapidly moved up the RSS hierarchy till he was appointed as a full-time pracharak in Barabanki, a town in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Impressed with his dedication to the Hindutva cause, he was appointed as the district organizer of the Hindu Jagran Manch, one of many RSS front organizations, and then, in 1983, as the Secretary of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s unit in Faizabad district, where Ayodhya is located.
At this time, the BJP had not as yet become a virtually unchallengeable political force in Uttar Pradesh, although it was rapidly winning converts in an increasingly communally- surcharged atmosphere. But Hindutva, the ideology of Brahminical supremacism, was not represented simply by the BJP alone. Various forms of it, including some that appeared somewhat diluted, were shared by many Congress leaders and supporters. One of these was a certain self-styled Shankaracharya allied to the Congress who asked Yugal-ji to work with him in an outfit which had a single point agenda: to ‘restore’ the disputed Babri mosque structure in Ayodhya to the Hindus.
It was at around this time, when Hindutva forces had begun galvanizing Hindu opinion and communal hatred across the country in the name of ‘liberating’ the Babri Masjid—a project in which he was himself involved—that Yugal-ji began developing second thoughts about the outfits that he had for so long been closely associated with. ‘I discovered that these groups were all dominated by Brahmins, and that they cared nothing for the poor, for the so-called low castes. They actually stood for a vicious system of caste discrimination while slyly denying this in public for fear of alienating their oppressed caste supporters, whom they routinely employed to attack and kill Muslims,’ he said. ‘I found their understanding of religion bore little resemblance to that of my own people back in my village, where inter-communal relations had generally been peaceful. These outfits, and the hatred they were spewing in the name of religion, were actually becoming a major burden on my own little head.’ They presented themselves as saviours of all Hindus, but even the hardcore Brahmin Hindutva activists Yugal-ji knew made him eat from separate plates kept apart for ‘low’ caste people, like himself, if they invited them to their homes for a meal. ‘I came to realize that what these people were propagating in the name of religion was raw hatred, greed and caste supremacism,’ he said.
In 1986, Yugal-ji joined the Rachnatmak Samaj, a group of social activists headed by the late Nirmala Deshpande. He was put in charge of the group’s work in the Faizabad district. By this time, he had established himself in Ayodhya as the manager of a small temple-cum-monastery not far from the Babri Masjid. It was there—where he still lives—right in the middle of the Hindutva dragon’s den, that he began fearlessly protesting and mobilizing public opinion against the Hindutva forces. Obviously, this was no easy task, and the intrepid Yugal-ji had to face stiff opposition, including from priests in the literally hundreds of temples scattered across the town. Many of these, he claimed, were actually criminals, including murderers, who had donned saffron robes to pass off as ‘holy-men’. A day before the Babri Masjid was torn down, Hindu mobs besieged his office, located in his temple premises, and threatened to bomb it down.
In 2000 Yugal-ji met with noted social activist and winner of the Magsaysay Award, Sandeep Pandey, and also with the noted Arya Samaj leader, Swami Agnivesh, both of whom were in the forefront of the struggle against Hindutva and communalism. Inspired by their work, he set up a society, Ayodhya Ki Awaz (‘The Voice of Ayodhya’), to promote communal harmony and address the plight of the oppressed castes, whom he now came to regard as the principal victims, along with Muslims and Christians, of Brahminism parading in the guise of Hindutva. Today, this organization has some fifty members, mostly Muslim, Dalit and Backward Caste youth in Ayodhya and surrounding villages and towns.
Over the years, activists of Ayodhya ki Awaz have been closely engaged in struggles against communalism, particularly against Hindutva aggression. It brings out a Hindi monthly magazine, edited by Yugal-ji, and organizes regular meetings in villages, aiming particularly at Dalits and Backward Caste youth (who, Yugal-ji noted, are routinely used by Hindutva Brahminical forces as foot-soldiers to attack Muslims in what are euphemistically-termed ‘Hindu-Muslim riots’), using innovative means such as bhajans that evoke popular oppressed caste icons such as Kabir and Babasaheb Ambedkar. ‘We tell them that even if a grand Ram temple is built in Ayodhya, they won’t gain a thing from it. It will be controlled by Brahmin priests, who will make a living eating off the domations of the credulous. We tell them that they won’t find salvation in a temple of stone and mortar,’ he explained.
Over the years, Jugal-ji and his team (which now includes activists from different religious and caste backgrounds from across the country) have organized numerous sadbhavana yatras—rallies for communal harmony—the latest being last year, when they traveled all the way from Ayodhya to Ajmer, seat of the shrine of India’s most revered Sufi, Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, stopping in towns all the way to address public gatherings.
I try and imagine myself in Yugal-ji’s place, fighting Hindutva (or any other form of fascism for that matter) while living in Ayodhya, right in the lion’s lair—I know this I couldn’t dare. I want to touch Yugal-ji’s feet in respect and awe, so overwhelmed am I by his sincerity and passion, but he restrains me and holds me back. He recounts the opposition that he has faced in the course of his crusade for communal harmony over the years. He tells me about his experiences as chief guest at a rally organized in Lucknow in 2006 by a group of oppressed caste activists of the Vishwa Shudra Mahasabha (the name having being deliberately chosen to counter the claims of the Brahmin Vishwa Hindu Parishad to speak for all ‘Hindus’). ‘I garlanded a picture of Ram, the Brahminical god-king, with shoes, because Ram, as the Ramayana says, lopped off the head of an innocent Shudra named Shambhukh for daring to violate the draconian law of caste,’ he goes on. For this, he was arrested and spent almost four months in prison, while enraged ‘upper’ caste men brutally assaulted the lawyers (both ‘low’ castes) who defended him.
Unfazed by the opposition he faced, Yugal-ji continued his battle against Brahminism even inside Ayodhya. Sometime in 2007, he took up the issue of a board in a public park in the town named after Tuslidas, author of the Ramayana, which was maintained out of government funds. The board had boldly declared: ‘A Brahmin, no matter how despicable his deeds, is worthy of being worshipped. A Shudra, no matter what good deeds he does, is ignoble.’ Enraged by the slogan, Yugal-ji sent a notice to the Commissioner and the Director of Parks, demanding that the board be taken down. ‘I wrote to them that 80 per cent of Indians, including myself, are so-called Shudras, and it was an insult to all of us. Tulsidas’ Ramayana, that preaches hatred for the Shudras, was an affront to our dignity. The slogan was also against the Constitution of India,’ he explains. If the board was not removed within a fortnight, he threatened that he and his supporters would tear it down themselves.
Buckling under pressure, the board was removed, but that did not settle matters. The local unit of the Sanatan Brahmin Samaj rose up in protest, organizing a demonstration and threatening to take revenge on Yugal-ji. A senior VHP leader even announced a sum of a lakh of rupees for Yugal-ji’s head.
I ask Yugal-ji to tell me his views about the Babri Masjid controversy that continues to rankle unsolved. ‘It was a mosque, no doubt,’ he insists. ‘There was no temple on the spot before. Indeed, Ram was not even worshipped in ancient times, the cult of Ram being a relatively new invention. So, there’s no question at all of the Mughal king Babar having destroyed a Ram temple and building a mosque in its place.’ Yugal-ji continues, ‘No one knows if Ram was ever born, or even if he was a historical figure at all. The Puranas claim he was born nine lakh years ago or so, but of course no recorded history exists from that period.’ But that is not all, he says. ‘As far as the Shudras, who form eighty per cent of India ’s population, are concerned, Ram is simply unworthy of worship. He worked to uphold the Brahminical social order and the degradation of the oppressed castes, though Brahmins and other so-called ‘upper’ castes, who live off the sweat and blood of the Shudras, might believe him to be divine.’
I am eager to learn what Yugal-ji believes to be the cure to the curse of communalism. ‘Ultimately’, he insists, ‘the only lasting solution is for human beings to identify themselves as just that—simply as humans. As long as we continue to regard ourselves as Hindus or Muslims or whatever, the menace of communalism can never be cured. We have to move towards a stage when identities are no longer premised or bracketed with religion. Our only identities should be that of being human. The final antidote to communalism is humanism’
Yugal-ji handles my irksome questions about his own religious faith somewhat indirectly and with tact, but I suspect that he is, like me, something of an agnostic. ‘You should be a good, compassionate person, and that is enough as far as I am concerned,’ he cryptically answers. ‘Righteous action, as the Buddha says, is what ultimately matters, not what caste you are born into, or what religious beliefs you profess or what name you call the Divine, if it does exists, by.’ He evokes Buddhist wisdom again: ‘The Buddha taught his companions not to blindly follow whatever he said. Rather, they should ponder on his words and accept them only if it appealed to their intelligence and conformed to their welfare and that of the majority, the bahujan.’
‘All institutionalized forms of religions place their scriptures above human intelligence and block human freedom and that is where the problem lies’, Yugal-ji goes on. ‘They soon become cages,’ he continues, ‘especially once they develop a system of priesthood, intermediaries or scholars who claim to have privileged access to the truth. Some might appear to be gilded cages or made of silver, but cages they remain. But it is the bird that flies in the open sky, using its own intelligence, that alone is truly happy.’
Yugal-ji can be contacted on ayodhyakiawaj@yahoo.com
A man—a temple priest no less—taking on the Hindutva brigade at its very epicentre! I scrambled across the lawn to meet him. I simply had to hear his story. I introduced myself, and we got talking. I listened, humbled and stunned, as Yugal-ji began to tell me about himself, his life, his vision of and for the world, and, most especially, about his valiant struggle against communalism and institutionalized religion. By the time he had finished—two hours later—I had all but completely fallen in love with him.
Yugal-ji was born in 1954, in a village along the Indo-Nepalese border in Bihar ’s Sitamarhi district. His father, a poor peasant from the Yadav caste, insisted that his son must receive a decent education. He was sent to school, and then to college for Sanskrit studies, for which he shifted to Ayodhya, where he lived in an ashram and earned the coveted Shastri degree. There, sometime in the mid-seventies, he joined the RSS. ‘I was a young, energetic lad then, and loved playing games’ he reminisced. The local RSS shakha had devised a clever way of trapping young Hindu boys by organizing sports events. ‘That’s how I fell into their snare.’ He rapidly moved up the RSS hierarchy till he was appointed as a full-time pracharak in Barabanki, a town in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Impressed with his dedication to the Hindutva cause, he was appointed as the district organizer of the Hindu Jagran Manch, one of many RSS front organizations, and then, in 1983, as the Secretary of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s unit in Faizabad district, where Ayodhya is located.
At this time, the BJP had not as yet become a virtually unchallengeable political force in Uttar Pradesh, although it was rapidly winning converts in an increasingly communally- surcharged atmosphere. But Hindutva, the ideology of Brahminical supremacism, was not represented simply by the BJP alone. Various forms of it, including some that appeared somewhat diluted, were shared by many Congress leaders and supporters. One of these was a certain self-styled Shankaracharya allied to the Congress who asked Yugal-ji to work with him in an outfit which had a single point agenda: to ‘restore’ the disputed Babri mosque structure in Ayodhya to the Hindus.
It was at around this time, when Hindutva forces had begun galvanizing Hindu opinion and communal hatred across the country in the name of ‘liberating’ the Babri Masjid—a project in which he was himself involved—that Yugal-ji began developing second thoughts about the outfits that he had for so long been closely associated with. ‘I discovered that these groups were all dominated by Brahmins, and that they cared nothing for the poor, for the so-called low castes. They actually stood for a vicious system of caste discrimination while slyly denying this in public for fear of alienating their oppressed caste supporters, whom they routinely employed to attack and kill Muslims,’ he said. ‘I found their understanding of religion bore little resemblance to that of my own people back in my village, where inter-communal relations had generally been peaceful. These outfits, and the hatred they were spewing in the name of religion, were actually becoming a major burden on my own little head.’ They presented themselves as saviours of all Hindus, but even the hardcore Brahmin Hindutva activists Yugal-ji knew made him eat from separate plates kept apart for ‘low’ caste people, like himself, if they invited them to their homes for a meal. ‘I came to realize that what these people were propagating in the name of religion was raw hatred, greed and caste supremacism,’ he said.
In 1986, Yugal-ji joined the Rachnatmak Samaj, a group of social activists headed by the late Nirmala Deshpande. He was put in charge of the group’s work in the Faizabad district. By this time, he had established himself in Ayodhya as the manager of a small temple-cum-monastery not far from the Babri Masjid. It was there—where he still lives—right in the middle of the Hindutva dragon’s den, that he began fearlessly protesting and mobilizing public opinion against the Hindutva forces. Obviously, this was no easy task, and the intrepid Yugal-ji had to face stiff opposition, including from priests in the literally hundreds of temples scattered across the town. Many of these, he claimed, were actually criminals, including murderers, who had donned saffron robes to pass off as ‘holy-men’. A day before the Babri Masjid was torn down, Hindu mobs besieged his office, located in his temple premises, and threatened to bomb it down.
In 2000 Yugal-ji met with noted social activist and winner of the Magsaysay Award, Sandeep Pandey, and also with the noted Arya Samaj leader, Swami Agnivesh, both of whom were in the forefront of the struggle against Hindutva and communalism. Inspired by their work, he set up a society, Ayodhya Ki Awaz (‘The Voice of Ayodhya’), to promote communal harmony and address the plight of the oppressed castes, whom he now came to regard as the principal victims, along with Muslims and Christians, of Brahminism parading in the guise of Hindutva. Today, this organization has some fifty members, mostly Muslim, Dalit and Backward Caste youth in Ayodhya and surrounding villages and towns.
Over the years, activists of Ayodhya ki Awaz have been closely engaged in struggles against communalism, particularly against Hindutva aggression. It brings out a Hindi monthly magazine, edited by Yugal-ji, and organizes regular meetings in villages, aiming particularly at Dalits and Backward Caste youth (who, Yugal-ji noted, are routinely used by Hindutva Brahminical forces as foot-soldiers to attack Muslims in what are euphemistically-termed ‘Hindu-Muslim riots’), using innovative means such as bhajans that evoke popular oppressed caste icons such as Kabir and Babasaheb Ambedkar. ‘We tell them that even if a grand Ram temple is built in Ayodhya, they won’t gain a thing from it. It will be controlled by Brahmin priests, who will make a living eating off the domations of the credulous. We tell them that they won’t find salvation in a temple of stone and mortar,’ he explained.
Over the years, Jugal-ji and his team (which now includes activists from different religious and caste backgrounds from across the country) have organized numerous sadbhavana yatras—rallies for communal harmony—the latest being last year, when they traveled all the way from Ayodhya to Ajmer, seat of the shrine of India’s most revered Sufi, Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, stopping in towns all the way to address public gatherings.
I try and imagine myself in Yugal-ji’s place, fighting Hindutva (or any other form of fascism for that matter) while living in Ayodhya, right in the lion’s lair—I know this I couldn’t dare. I want to touch Yugal-ji’s feet in respect and awe, so overwhelmed am I by his sincerity and passion, but he restrains me and holds me back. He recounts the opposition that he has faced in the course of his crusade for communal harmony over the years. He tells me about his experiences as chief guest at a rally organized in Lucknow in 2006 by a group of oppressed caste activists of the Vishwa Shudra Mahasabha (the name having being deliberately chosen to counter the claims of the Brahmin Vishwa Hindu Parishad to speak for all ‘Hindus’). ‘I garlanded a picture of Ram, the Brahminical god-king, with shoes, because Ram, as the Ramayana says, lopped off the head of an innocent Shudra named Shambhukh for daring to violate the draconian law of caste,’ he goes on. For this, he was arrested and spent almost four months in prison, while enraged ‘upper’ caste men brutally assaulted the lawyers (both ‘low’ castes) who defended him.
Unfazed by the opposition he faced, Yugal-ji continued his battle against Brahminism even inside Ayodhya. Sometime in 2007, he took up the issue of a board in a public park in the town named after Tuslidas, author of the Ramayana, which was maintained out of government funds. The board had boldly declared: ‘A Brahmin, no matter how despicable his deeds, is worthy of being worshipped. A Shudra, no matter what good deeds he does, is ignoble.’ Enraged by the slogan, Yugal-ji sent a notice to the Commissioner and the Director of Parks, demanding that the board be taken down. ‘I wrote to them that 80 per cent of Indians, including myself, are so-called Shudras, and it was an insult to all of us. Tulsidas’ Ramayana, that preaches hatred for the Shudras, was an affront to our dignity. The slogan was also against the Constitution of India,’ he explains. If the board was not removed within a fortnight, he threatened that he and his supporters would tear it down themselves.
Buckling under pressure, the board was removed, but that did not settle matters. The local unit of the Sanatan Brahmin Samaj rose up in protest, organizing a demonstration and threatening to take revenge on Yugal-ji. A senior VHP leader even announced a sum of a lakh of rupees for Yugal-ji’s head.
I ask Yugal-ji to tell me his views about the Babri Masjid controversy that continues to rankle unsolved. ‘It was a mosque, no doubt,’ he insists. ‘There was no temple on the spot before. Indeed, Ram was not even worshipped in ancient times, the cult of Ram being a relatively new invention. So, there’s no question at all of the Mughal king Babar having destroyed a Ram temple and building a mosque in its place.’ Yugal-ji continues, ‘No one knows if Ram was ever born, or even if he was a historical figure at all. The Puranas claim he was born nine lakh years ago or so, but of course no recorded history exists from that period.’ But that is not all, he says. ‘As far as the Shudras, who form eighty per cent of India ’s population, are concerned, Ram is simply unworthy of worship. He worked to uphold the Brahminical social order and the degradation of the oppressed castes, though Brahmins and other so-called ‘upper’ castes, who live off the sweat and blood of the Shudras, might believe him to be divine.’
I am eager to learn what Yugal-ji believes to be the cure to the curse of communalism. ‘Ultimately’, he insists, ‘the only lasting solution is for human beings to identify themselves as just that—simply as humans. As long as we continue to regard ourselves as Hindus or Muslims or whatever, the menace of communalism can never be cured. We have to move towards a stage when identities are no longer premised or bracketed with religion. Our only identities should be that of being human. The final antidote to communalism is humanism’
Yugal-ji handles my irksome questions about his own religious faith somewhat indirectly and with tact, but I suspect that he is, like me, something of an agnostic. ‘You should be a good, compassionate person, and that is enough as far as I am concerned,’ he cryptically answers. ‘Righteous action, as the Buddha says, is what ultimately matters, not what caste you are born into, or what religious beliefs you profess or what name you call the Divine, if it does exists, by.’ He evokes Buddhist wisdom again: ‘The Buddha taught his companions not to blindly follow whatever he said. Rather, they should ponder on his words and accept them only if it appealed to their intelligence and conformed to their welfare and that of the majority, the bahujan.’
‘All institutionalized forms of religions place their scriptures above human intelligence and block human freedom and that is where the problem lies’, Yugal-ji goes on. ‘They soon become cages,’ he continues, ‘especially once they develop a system of priesthood, intermediaries or scholars who claim to have privileged access to the truth. Some might appear to be gilded cages or made of silver, but cages they remain. But it is the bird that flies in the open sky, using its own intelligence, that alone is truly happy.’
Yugal-ji can be contacted on ayodhyakiawaj@yahoo.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)